Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 4;9(3):e88788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088788

Figure 5. Analysis of Tregs in sIBM patients.

Figure 5

Representative flow cytometry analysis of CD25+CD127low subpopulations among CD3+CD4+ T lymphocytes in a control subject (A). Tregs were defined as Foxp3+ cells among the previously gated CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127low subpopulation (B). Non-specific staining (isotype control) was used to define FoxP3+ cells (C). Pooled data showing the percentage of Tregs among CD4+ T cells from sIBM patients and controls in the systemic compartment (p = 0.01). Horizontal lines indicate means (D). Percentage of inhibition (±SD; n = 4) of Tregs on the proliferation of autologous CD4+CD25 T cells (responders). Responder+allogeneic MNCs were used as positive control. Proliferation of responder cells was measured by 3H-Tdr incorporation (counts per minute, cpm) (E). Representative flow cytometry analysis showing resting Tregs (rTregs: CD45RA+CD25+) and activated Tregs (aTregs: CD45RACD25high) among CD4+ T lymphocytes in a control subject (F). Pooled data showing rTregs and aTregs from sIBM patients and controls (p = 0.0003) (G). Immunostaining of a muscle section from a sIBM patient, showing Foxp3+ cells (H) in the muscle infiltrate. Immunofluorescence staining showing Foxp3+ cells (red) within the muscle infiltrate in a sIBM patients (I). The upper left corner shows a FoxP3+ cell (red), the upper right corner shows CD4+ cells (green), the lower left corner shows nuclear staining (dapi); coexpression of CD4 and FoxP3 is shown by merged fluorescence images in the lower right corner. Horizontal lines indicate means; *p<0.05.