. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.

Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychobiol. 2013 Sep 4;56(4):836–849. doi: 10.1002/dev.21156

Table 2.

Multiple Regression for 3-way Interaction predicting Children’s Emotional Security

	Involvement	Behavioral Dysregulation	Emotional Reactivity
Covariates
Pre-task Cortisol	− .07 (.14)	− .11 (.09)	− .09 (.08)
Pre-task sAA	.01 (.03)	− .02 (.02)	.003 (.02)
Assessment Time	.02 (.02)	− .03 (.02)^*	− .004 (.01)
Tape Stimuli	− .15 (.09)	− .02 (.06)	.01 (.05)
Child Gender	.03 (.09)	− .10 (.06)	− .04 (.05)
Child Age	.06 (.09)	.08 (.06)	.04 (.05)
Family Income	− .02 (.02)	.00 (.01)	− .02 (.01)
Main Effects
Post Conflict Cortisol	− .02 (.15)	.03 (.09)	.05 (.08)
Post Conflict sAA	.03 (.03)	.04 (.02)	.01 (.02)
Marital Conflict	.03 (.01)^*	.03 (.01)^***	.01 (.01)^*
2-Way Interactions
Cortisol X sAA	.01 (.03)	− .03 (.02)	− .01 (.02)
Cortisol X Conflict	− .08 (.02)^**	− .03 (.02)	− .01 (.01)
sAA X Conflict	.003 (.004)	.00 (.003)	.002 (.002)
3-Way Interaction
Cortisol X sAA X Conflict	− .03 (.01)^**	− .01 (.01)^*	− .01 (.01)^*
R²	.15	.19	.10

Note. Unstandardized coefficients (and standard errors) are reported. Cortisol and sAA levels are transformed variables. Child gender was coded dichotomously with 0 for boys and 1 for girls. Bolded values indicate significance.

p < .05;

^**

p < .01;

^***

p < .001