Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1996 Apr 30;93(9):3726–3731. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.9.3726

Initiation process of earthquakes and its implications for seismic hazard reduction strategy.

H Kanamori 1
PMCID: PMC39429  PMID: 11607657

Abstract

For the average citizen and the public, "earthquake prediction" means "short-term prediction," a prediction of a specific earthquake on a relatively short time scale. Such prediction must specify the time, place, and magnitude of the earthquake in question with sufficiently high reliability. For this type of prediction, one must rely on some short-term precursors. Examinations of strain changes just before large earthquakes suggest that consistent detection of such precursory strain changes cannot be expected. Other precursory phenomena such as foreshocks and nonseismological anomalies do not occur consistently either. Thus, reliable short-term prediction would be very difficult. Although short-term predictions with large uncertainties could be useful for some areas if their social and economic environments can tolerate false alarms, such predictions would be impractical for most modern industrialized cities. A strategy for effective seismic hazard reduction is to take full advantage of the recent technical advancements in seismology, computers, and communication. In highly industrialized communities, rapid earthquake information is critically important for emergency services agencies, utilities, communications, financial companies, and media to make quick reports and damage estimates and to determine where emergency response is most needed. Long-term forecast, or prognosis, of earthquakes is important for development of realistic building codes, retrofitting existing structures, and land-use planning, but the distinction between short-term and long-term predictions needs to be clearly communicated to the public to avoid misunderstanding.

Full text

PDF
3726

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Hill D. P., Reasenberg P. A., Michael A., Arabaz W. J., Beroza G., Brumbaugh D., Brune J. N., Castro R., Davis S., Depolo D., Ellsworth W. L., Gomberg J., Harmsen S., House L., Jackson S. M., Johnston M. J., Jones L., Keller R., Malone S., Munguia L., Nava S., Pechmann J. C., Sanford A., Simpson R. W., Smith R. B., Stark M., Stickney M., Vidal A., Walter S., Wong V., Zollweg J. Seismicity remotely triggered by the magnitude 7.3 landers, california, earthquake. Science. 1993 Jun 11;260(5114):1617–1623. doi: 10.1126/science.260.5114.1617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ihmlé P. F., Harabaglia P., Jordan T. H. Teleseismic detection of a slow precursor to the great 1989 macquarie ridge earthquake. Science. 1993 Jul 9;261(5118):177–183. doi: 10.1126/science.261.5118.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sood A. K., Sorosky J. I., Mayr N., Krogman S., Anderson B., Buller R. E., Hussey D. H. Radiotherapeutic management of cervical carcinoma that complicates pregnancy. Cancer. 1997 Sep 15;80(6):1073–1078. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970915)80:6<1073::aid-cncr9>3.0.co;2-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES