Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 24;70(Pt 1):34–39. doi: 10.1107/S2053230X13033621

Table 1. Crystallographic data and refinement statistics.

  Apo TbAK TbAK–adenosine–AMPPNP
Data collection
 Diffraction source DLS beamline I03 DLS beamline I24
 Wavelength (Å) 0.9763 0.9686
 Temperature (K) 100 100
 Detector Pilatus 6M-F Pilatus 6M Prosport+
 Rotation range per image (°) 0.2 0.2
 Total rotation range (°) 180 220
Crystal data
 Space group P41212 C2
 Unit-cell parameters
   a (Å) 60.08 184.53
   b (Å) 60.08 90.22
   c (Å) 192.86 98.04
  α (°) 90.00 90.00
  β (°) 90.00 103.78
  γ (°) 90.00 90.00
 Resolution (Å) 57.36–2.60 (2.74–2.60) 95.21–2.60 (2.74–2.60)
 Total reflections 132048 (20863) 160133 (23793)
 Unique reflections 11649 (1664) 47962 (6973)
 Completeness (%) 99.90 (100) 99.5 (99.4)
 Multiplicity 11.3 (12.5) 3.3 (3.4)
R merge 0.120 (0.395) 0.176 (0.991)
 〈I/σ(I)〉 15.8 (6.3) 6.6 (2.3)
 Matthews coefficient (Å3 Da−1) 2.28 2.59
Refinement statistics
 Reflections, working set 10989 45507
 Reflections, test set 660 2455
 Resolution range (Å) 57.36–2.60 95.21–2.60
R factor 0.170 0.186
R free 0.231 0.221
 No. of non-H atoms
  Protein 2463 10276
  Ligand 192
  Water 157 148
 Mean B factors (Å2)
  Protein 38.0 45.2
  Ligand 44.4
  Water 40.5 38.3
 R.m.s. deviation from ideal
  Bond lengths (Å) 0.013 0.012
  Bond angles (°) 1.466 1.531
 Ramachandran plot (%)
  Residues in favoured region 93.6 96.05
  Residues in allowed region 5.8 3.58
  Outliers 0.6 0.37
MolProbity score 1.35 1.45
 Poor rotamers (%) 1.61 2.01
 PDB code 4n08 4n09

The Ramachandran plot was generated with Coot (Emsley et al., 2010).

Poor rotamer analysis was performed using MolProbity (Chen et al., 2010).