Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 30;20(Pt 2):347–354. doi: 10.1107/S0909049513000411

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Measured rate response obtained from 180 ns bunched fill with both bunched spacing and shaping time as free parameters. Comparison with Fig. 2 indicates a substantial improvement in goodness of fit. The model of equation (7) was preferred for shaping times 1, 3 and 4 while the model of equation (6) was preferred for shaping times 2, 5, 6 and 7.