Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Rheumatol. 2014 Jan 15;41(3):509–515. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130609

Table 3.

Mean scores on instrument subscales at baseline and follow-up in patients with knee symptomsa

Patient global on follow-up
Baseline Great deal better Somewhat better About the same
KNEE N=141 N=12 N=26 N=81
ICOAP Pain 53.3 (±23.0) 17.4 (±12.2) 41.3 (±14.1) 47.4 (±22.0)
ICOAP constant pain 50.7 (±26.0) 13.8 (±13.3) 38.5 (±19.7) 43.0 (±24.3)
ICOAP intermittent pain 55.5 (±23.3) 20.5 (±14.9) 43.6 (±15.5) 51.1 (±22.1)
HOOS-PS/KOOS-PS 54.5 (±19.4) 31.4 (±12.2) 52.1 (±17.4) 51.0 (±18.5)
HOOS-QOL/KOOS-QOL 27.4 (±21.1) 59.4 (±19.9) 34.8 (±16.5) 29.5 (±20.2)

N=141

a

Only 1 and 5 patients reported feeling great deal better or somewhat better among those with hip symptoms, thereby not allowing us to perform meaningful analyses for patients with hip symptoms

b

N=20 and N=69 for the respective categories for HOOS-QOL/KOOS-QOL scores; 11 patients reported worse status on patient global question