Table 4.
Improvement in score Mean (SD) | Relative (%) improvement in score | MDC90 | |
---|---|---|---|
ICOAP Pain (scale 0–100) | |||
Moderate Improvement (=“great deal better”) (N=12) | −26.7 (±14.8) | −60.5% | 49.6 |
MCID Improvement (=“somewhat better”) (N=26) | −18.5 (±22.0) | −31.0% | 46.6 |
ICOAP Constant Pain | |||
Moderate Improvement (=“great deal better”) (N=12) | −29.6 (±14.8) | −68.3% | 53.8 |
MCID Improvement (=“somewhat better”) (N=26) | −18.7 (±24.4) | −32.7% | 49.6 |
ICOAP Intermittent Pain | |||
Moderate Improvement (=“great deal better”) (N=12) | −24.3 (±17.9) | −54.3% | 48.7 |
MCID Improvement (=“somewhat better”) (N=26) | −18.4 (±25.4) | −29.7% | 50.8 |
KOOS-PS (scale 0–100) | |||
Moderate Improvement (=“great deal better”) (N=12) | −15.0 (±16.4) | −32.3% | 35.5 |
MCID Improvement (=“somewhat better”) (N=26) | −2.2 (±17.5) | −4.0% | 28.3 |
KOOS-QOL (scale 0–100) | |||
Moderate Improvement (=“great deal better”) (N=12) | 15.6 (±18.8) | 35.7% | 39.0 |
MCID Improvement (=“somewhat better”) (N=25) | 8.0 (±16.1) | 25.7% | 29.0 |
Relative (%) improvement in score was calculated as = 100* (followup score mean−baseline score mean)/baseline score mean