Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Nov 15;20(3):764–775. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2287

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics and fraction with HR mutations.

All Subjects N Fraction with Germline HR mutationa Fraction with Somatic HR mutationa

Median age (years) 59 y 53 y 59 y
 Range (27–89 y) (34–75 y) (29–80 y)

Site
 Ovary 304 .22 .08
 Fallopian tube 24 .42 .04
 Peritoneal 32 .22 .03
 Synch Ov/Endo 7 .29 .14

Histology
 High-gradeb serous 249 .26 .05
 Low-gradec serous 9 .11 0
 Poorly-differentiated NOS 48 .25 .13
 Clear cell 19 .05 .21
 High-gradeb endometrioid 20 .15 .10
 Low-gradec endometrioid 6 .17 .17
 Carcinosarcoma 12 .25 .08
 Otherd 4 .25 0

Stagee
 I 36 .17 .14
 II 19 .16 0
 III 255 .24 .08
 IV 49 .27 .04

Cytoreductione
 Optimal 243 .23 .09
 Suboptimal 109 .22 .06

Total 367 .24 .08
a

Cases with both a germline and somatic HR mutation were included in the germline HR category

b

Grade 2–3

c

Grade 1

d

Other = one malignant Brenner’s, one mucinous, and two mixed carcinomas

e

stage was unknown for 8 cases

f

cytoreduction status was not available for 15 cases

Synch Ov/Endo: cases classified pathologically as having two primary cancers arising from the ovary and endometrium

NOS: not otherwise specified