Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1996 Apr 30;93(9):3830–3837. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.9.3830

The organization of seismicity on fault networks.

L Knopoff 1
PMCID: PMC39444  PMID: 11607672

Abstract

Although models of homogeneous faults develop seismicity that has a Gutenberg-Richter distribution, this is only a transient state that is followed by events that are strongly influenced by the nature of the boundaries. Models with geometrical inhomogeneities of fracture thresholds can limit the sizes of earthquakes but now favor the characteristic earthquake model for large earthquakes. The character of the seismicity is extremely sensitive to distributions of inhomogeneities, suggesting that statistical rules for large earthquakes in one region may not be applicable to large earthquakes in another region. Model simulations on simple networks of faults with inhomogeneities of threshold develop episodes of lacunarity on all members of the network. There is no validity to the popular assumption that the average rate of slip on individual faults is a constant. Intermediate term precursory activity such as local quiescence and increases in intermediate-magnitude activity at long range are simulated well by the assumption that strong weakening of faults by injection of fluids and weakening of asperities on inhomogeneous models of fault networks is the dominant process; the heat flow paradox, the orientation of the stress field, and the low average stress drop in some earthquakes are understood in terms of the asperity model of inhomogeneous faulting.

Full text

PDF
3830

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abinante MS, Knopoff L. Quasidynamic model for earthquake simulations. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics. 1995 Nov;52(5):5675–5678. doi: 10.1103/physreve.52.5675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carlson JM, Langer JS. Mechanical model of an earthquake fault. Phys Rev A Gen Phys. 1989 Dec 1;40(11):6470–6484. doi: 10.1103/physreva.40.6470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carlson JM, Langer JS. Properties of earthquakes generated by fault dynamics. Phys Rev Lett. 1989 May 29;62(22):2632–2635. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Christensen K, Olami Z, Bak P. Deterministic 1/f noise in nonconserative models of self-organized criticality. Phys Rev Lett. 1992 Apr 20;68(16):2417–2420. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.2417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Christensen K, Olami Z. Scaling, phase transitions, and nonuniversality in a self-organized critical cellular-automaton model. Phys Rev A. 1992 Aug 15;46(4):1829–1838. doi: 10.1103/physreva.46.1829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ehrichs E. E., Jaeger H. M., Karczmar G. S., Knight J. B., Kuperman V. Y., Nagel S. R. Granular convection observed by magnetic resonance imaging. Science. 1995 Mar 17;267(5204):1632–1634. doi: 10.1126/science.267.5204.1632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. King G., Nabecaronlek J. Role of fault bends in the initiation and termination of earthquake rupture. Science. 1985 May 24;228(4702):984–987. doi: 10.1126/science.228.4702.984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Knight JB, Jaeger HM, Nagel SR. Vibration-induced size separation in granular media: The convection connection. Phys Rev Lett. 1993 Jun 14;70(24):3728–3731. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Knopoff L. A selective phenomenology of the seismicity of Southern California. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 30;93(9):3756–3763. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.9.3756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Knopoff L, Landoni JA, Abinante MS. Dynamical model of an earthquake fault with localization. Phys Rev A. 1992 Dec 15;46(12):7445–7449. doi: 10.1103/physreva.46.7445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu C. H., Nagel S. R., Schecter D. A., Coppersmith S. N., Majumdar S., Narayan O., Witten T. A. Force fluctuations in bead packs. Science. 1995 Jul 28;269(5223):513–515. doi: 10.1126/science.269.5223.513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nakanishi H. Cellular-automaton model of earthquakes with deterministic dynamics. Phys Rev A. 1990 Jun 15;41(12):7086–7089. doi: 10.1103/physreva.41.7086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nakanishi H. Statistical properties of the cellular-automaton model for earthquakes. Phys Rev A. 1991 Jun 15;43(12):6613–6621. doi: 10.1103/physreva.43.6613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Olami Z, Feder HJ, Christensen K. Self-organized criticality in a continuous, nonconservative cellular automaton modeling earthquakes. Phys Rev Lett. 1992 Feb 24;68(8):1244–1247. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Xu HJ, Knopoff L. Periodicity and chaos in a one-dimensional dynamical model of earthquakes. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics. 1994 Nov;50(5):3577–3581. doi: 10.1103/physreve.50.3577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Zoback M. D., Zoback M. L., Mount V. S., Suppe J., Eaton J. P., Healy J. H., Oppenheimer D., Reasenberg P., Jones L., Raleigh C. B., Wong I. G., Scotti O., Wentworth C. New evidence on the state of stress of the san andreas fault system. Science. 1987 Nov 20;238(4830):1105–1111. doi: 10.1126/science.238.4830.1105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES