Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bone. 2013 Nov 21;60:26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.11.015

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Cumulative distribution functions for CD and ZDSD in bone and tendon. ZDSD had significantly different distributions of collagen D-spacing in bone (n = 274 in CD, n = 294 in ZDSD, p = 0.015) and tendon (n = 371 in CD, n = 350 in ZDSD, p < 0.001) compared with CD rats. The ZDSD distribution is wider and shifted higher in both tissues with differences more pronounced in tendon.