Table 3.

Logistic regression of the odds for LLIN use by children under five years after the Ghana LLIN Campaign

Variable	N	%	Univariable analysis			Multivariable analysis
			OR	95% CI	P-value	Adj OR	95% CI	P-value
Area of residence
Urban	274	50.2	1.00		<0.001	1.00		0.20
Rural	633	70.9	2.42	1.65, 3.54		1.35	0.85, 2.16
Wealth quintile
Poorest	188	81.6	1.00		<0.001	1.00		0.002
Second	272	69.3	0.52	0.33, 0.82		0.54	0.33, 0.89
Middle	209	59.1	0.33	0.19, 0.57		0.38	0.20, 0.72
Fourth	150	49.9	0.22	0.13, 0.39		0.32	0.17, 0.61
Least poor	88	53.6	0.26	0.15, 0.46		0.61	0.30, 1.23
Head of household has any education
No	234	67.8	1.00		0.12
Yes	671	61.7	0.76	0.54, 1.07
Lives in HH with ≥1 LLIN observed hanging
No	140	27.3	1.00		<0.001	1.00		<0.001
Yes	767	82.7	12.7	9.15, 17.7		10.0	6.98, 14.5
Lives in HH with all/some LLINs hanged by volunteer
No	474	53.9	1.00		<0.001	1.00		0.02
Yes	433	77.4	2.94	2.15, 4.01		1.57	1.09, 2.27
Lives in HH with ≥1 LLIN per 2 people
No	432	51.4	1.00		<0.001	1.00		<0.001
Yes	473	79.2	3.59	2.63, 4.91		3.33	2.31, 4.82
HH respondent had heard ITN messages from community keep-up
No	619	60.6	1.00		0.03	1.00		0.96
Yes	289	69.0	1.45	1.03, 2.03		0.99	0.69, 1.42
HH respondent had heard ITN messages on radio
No	518	61.4	1.00		0.23
Yes	389	65.4	1.19	0.89, 1.58
HH respondent had seen ITN messages on TV
No	605	65.4	1.00		0.11
Yes	302	58.7	0.75	0.53, 1.07
HH respondent knew that ITNs prevent malaria
No	201	53.7	1.00		0.001	1.00		0.06
Yes	706	66.3	1.70	1.24, 2.33		1.43	0.99, 2.06

Odds ratios presented for Brong Ahafo, Central and Western regions combined.