Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 6;10(3):e1004158. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004158

Table 4. Enrichment by protein function of ANOVA-identified genes.

Protein class Actual R Expected Ratio p-value z-score In data set In protein function Protein function in database
Transcription factors 45 959 17.13 2.63 4.02E-09 6.934 10.56% 4.69% 4.02%
Phosphatases 7 230 4.109 1.70 1.20E-01 1.446 1.64% 3.04% 0.96%
Ligands 13 514 9.183 1.42 1.34E-01 1.285 3.05% 2.53% 2.16%
Kinases 16 654 11.68 1.37 1.29E-01 1.292 3.76% 2.45% 2.74%
Enzymes 54 2724 48.67 1.11 2.26E-01 0.8195 12.68% 1.98% 11.42%
Proteases 11 559 9.987 1.10 4.15E-01 0.3272 2.58% 1.97% 2.34%
Receptors 30 1565 27.96 1.07 3.71E-01 0.4026 7.04% 1.92% 6.56%
Other 253 16691 298.2 0.84 1.68E-06 -4.822 59.39% 1.52% 70.00%

Over representation analysis of the 403 ANOVA interaction-identified genes was performed based on broadly defined protein functions. The Metacore database for the human genome annotates 23,844 network objects for the background list. Column abbreviations: Actual, number of ANOVA identified objects for a given class; R, number of background objects for a given class; Expected, mean value for hypergeometric distribution (403*R/23,844); Ratio, the ratio of actual/expected; p-value, probability to have the given actual value or higher (or lower for negative z-score); In data set, percent of objects of a given function in the ANOVA dataset; In protein function, percent of ANOVA objects of a given function relative to the number of background objects with the same function; Protein function in database, percentage of ANOVA objects of a given function in the background list.