Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 31;17(1):1–12. doi: 10.1007/s40477-014-0067-8

Table 3.

Diagnostic performance of ultrasound and scintigraphy

Single parathyroid gland Group B Group C Group A Significance
group B vs. group C
Sensitivity: ultrasound 84 % 71 % 78 % n.s.
Specificity: ultrasound 94 % 93 % 94 % n.s.
Accuracy: ultrasound 91 % 87 % 89 % n.s.
Prevalence: ultrasound 28 % 28 % 28 % n.s.
Positive predictive value (PPV) ultrasound 85 % 79 % 82 % n.s.
Nuclear medicine (%) Nuclear medicine (%) Nuclear medicine (%) Significance
group B vs. group C
Sensitivity: scintigraphy 71 73 72 n.s.
Specificity: scintigraphy 90 90 90 n.s.
Accuracy: scintigraphy 85 85 85 n.s.
Prevalence: scintigraphy 28 28 28 n.s.
Positive predictive value (PPV)
scintigraphy
74 73 74 n.s.
Overall sensitivity (use of both methods “in parallel”) 88 87 88
Positive predictive value (PPV)
ultrasound vs. scintigraphy
n.s. n.s. <0.05
Side (right/left) Group B (%) Group C (%) Group A (%) Significance
group B vs. group C
Sensitivity: ultrasound 91 78 85 n.s.
Specificity: ultrasound 95 93 94 n.s.
Accuracy: ultrasound 93 85 89 n.s.
Prevalence: ultrasound 53 52 53 n.s.
Positive predictive value (PPV)
ultrasound
95 93 94 n.s.
Nuclear medicine (%) Nuclear medicine (%) Nuclear medicine (%) Significance
group B vs. group C
Sensitivity: scintigraphy 77 80 78 n.s.
Specificity: scintigraphy 88 84 86 n.s.
Accuracy: scintigraphy 82 82 82 n.s.
Prevalence: scintigraphy 53 52 53 n.s.
Positive predictive value (PPV)
scintigraphy
88 85 86 n.s
Overall sensitivity (use of both methods “in parallel”) 95 92 94
Positive predictive value (PPV)
ultrasound vs. scintigraphy
n.s. n.s. n.s.