Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Oct 31;231(5):939–948. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3316-1

TABLE 2.

MIXED MODELS ANALYSES OF BEHAVIORAL OUTCOMES IN THE INTENT-TO-TREAT AND EVALUABLE GROUPS

ITT (n = 36) Evaluable (n = 33)
HAM-D F(1,145)=2.05, p=0.15 β=0.60, SE=0.42 F(1,145)=1.95, p=0.17 β=0.59, SE=0.42
HAM-A F(1,111)=3.18, p=0.08 β=0.92, SE=0.52 F(1,111)=3.25, p=0.07 β=0.93, SE=0.52
EPDS F(1,137)=0.43, p=0.51 β=0.24, SE=0.37 F(1,137)=0.42, p=0.52 β=0.24, SE=0.37

Legend: F-statistics and p-values, betas and standard errors (SE) from mixed models analyses. HAM-D - Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; HAM-A - Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; EPDS - Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Independent variables were treatment, time (linear and quadratic term), treatment by time interaction and corresponding baseline measure as a covariate. That is, baseline HAM-D was a used as covariate for analyses of HAM-D, baseline HAM-A was used as a covariate for analyses of HAM-A and baseline EPDS was used as a covariate for analyses of EPDS.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure