Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Oct 31;231(5):939–948. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3316-1

TABLE 3.

MIXED MODELS ANALYSES OF BEHAVIORAL OUTCOMES IN THE INTENT-TO-TREAT AND EVALUABLE GROUPS AMONG WOMEN WITH ILLNESS ONSET WITHIN FOUR WEEKS OF GIVING BIRTH

ITT (n = 36) Evaluable (n = 33)
HAM-D F(1,104)=6.98, p=0.01 β=1.18, SE=0.45 F(1,104)=6.87, p=0.01 β=1.18, SE=0.45
HAM-A F(1,87)=4.92, p=0.03 β=1.19, SE=0.54 F(1,87)=5.08, p=0.03 β=1.22, SE=0.54
EPDS F(1,98)=4.16, p=0.04 β=0.91, SE=0.45 F(1,98)=4.16, p=0.04 β=0.91, SE=0.45

Legend: F-statistics and p-values, betas and standard errors (SE) from mixed models analyses. HAM-D - Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; HAM-A - Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale; EPDS - Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Independent variables were treatment, time (linear and quadratic term), treatment by time interaction and the corresponding baseline measure as a covariate. That is, baseline HAM-D was used as a covariate for analyses of HAM-D, baseline HAM-A was used as a covariate for analyses of HAM-A and baseline EPDS was used as a covariate for analyses of EPDS) .

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure