Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 17;14:31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-31

Table 4.

Results of the QTL mapping procedure for each phenology trait

QTL LG Marker a P (cM) b SI (cM) c LOD α d PEV e
Bud burst in indoor conditions (BBI)
BBI.Ib
Ib
I_21om_sa (L29gr.164f)
150.9
9.5
7.86
0.001 gw
3.5
BBI.II.1
II♂-2
II_30_sa_pIII
16.9
23.5
4.54
0.005 cw
7.5
BBI.II.2
II♂-2
II_33_sa
42.1
17.5
4.22
0.007 cw
excl
BBI.II.3
II♂-2
II_35_sa (L12b.203f)
80.6
12
6.20
0.006 gw
7.1
BBI.VII
VII
Ro4b
64.4
48.5
3.04
0.032 cw
excl
BBI.IX
IX
IX_1_sa
56.6
10
3.60
0.010 cw
3.2
BBI.X.1
X
X-4
83.7
41
3.55
0.015 cw
excl
BBI.X.2
X
X-21_sa (L3gr.227f)
140.2
19.2
3.36
0.023 cw
2.8
BBI.A
A
XVI-13_sa
17.0
35
3.95
0.001 cw
6.2
BBI total sum of explained variance
30.3
Bud burst in field conditions year 2009 (BBF09)
BBF09.Ib
Ib
XVI_12_om_sa_pI
99.5
13
6.65
0.001 gw
10.3
BBF09.II
II♂-2
II_24_sa
59.9
74.5
2.78
0.038 cw
2.0
BBF09.IV
IV
IV_20_sa (L2gr.226f)
71.1
87.9
3.00
0.028 cw
excl
BBF09.VI
VI-1
VI_15_sa (L13y.371)
48.6
22.5
5.24
0.011 gw
3.7
BBF09.VII
VII
VII-3b
43.6
70.5
2.78
0.043 cw
excl
BBF09.X
X
X_19_sa
116.7
32.5
4.19
0.003 cw
1.4
BBF09.XIV
XIV♂
XIV_18_sa_pIII
85.9
17
5.89
0.003 gw
4.4
BBF09.XVIII
XVIII
XVIII_6_sa
14.6
18.5
3.25
0.018 cw
4.5
BBF09.A
A
XVI_13_sa
34.9
18.5
2.77
0.001 cw
excl
BBF09.B
B
SB945
27.7
42.3
2.28
0.049 cw
1.3
BBF09 total sum of explained variance
27.6
Bud burst in field conditions year 2010 (BBF10)
BBF10.Ia
Ia
SB331
170.3
36.3
4.60
0.005 cw
1.9
BBF10.Ib.1
Ib
I_51om_sa
107.2
28
3.78
0.022 cw
excl
BBF10.Ib.2
Ib
I-32_sa
215.5
71.5
3.63
0.026 cw
4.2
BBF10.II
II♂-2
R_41_sa_pI
20.9
17
13.32
0.001 gw
14.1
BBF10.VI.1
VI-1
VI-3d
8.3
15.5
7.96
0.005 gw
7.3
BBF10.VI.2
VI-1
SB496
61.8
13
4.04
0.005 cw
excl
BBF10.VII
VII
Ph18
52.2
28.5
4.78
0.002 cw
1.0
BBF10.VIII.1
VIII-2
VIII_3_sa
32.7
29.3
4.75
0.001 cw
5.6
BBF10.VIII.2
VIII-3
VIII_20_sa_pI
41.4
33
6.72
0.025 gw
3.4
BBF10.IX.1
IX
IX_5_sa
36.9
47.5
3.79
0.008 cw
2.1
BBF10.IX.2
IX
R_60_sa_pI
78.2
23.9
3.73
0.011 cw
3.5
BBF10.X
X
Ph2
45.9
25
4.92
0.002 cw
3.2
BBF10.XIV
XIV♂
XIV-4_sa
82.3
19
3.38
0.019 cw
excl
BBF10.XVII
XVII
II_37_sa_pI
123.8
23.5
3.19
0.041 cw
excl
BBF10.XVIII
XVIII
XVIII_6_sa
14.6
28
4.34
0.002 cw
3.0
BBF10.A
A
XVI-13_sa
35.0
22
3.05
0.001 cw
3.9
BBF10 total sum of explained variance
53.2
Growth Cessation in indoor conditions (GCI)
GCI.Ib
Ib
XVII_8om_sa
182.8
34
3.93
0.015 cw
5.4
GCI.II
II♂-2
II_35_sa
84.8
14
4.70
0.006 cw
4.6
GCI.V
V♂
V-5_sa
52.8
24
5.22
0.028 gw
11.5
GCI total sum of explained variance
21.5
Growth cessation in field conditions year 2008 (GCF08)
GCF08.Ia
Ia
R_29_sa
42.0
37.5
3.38
0.043 cw
2.3
GCF08.Ib
Ib
XVI_18_sa
80.1
12.5
7.28
0.001 cw
6.1
GCF08.II
II♂-2
II_35_sa
84.8
8
10.54
0.002 gw
16.7
GCF08.III
III
III_8om_sa
24.8
36
2.91
0.045 cw
1.7
GCF08.V
V♂
V-5_sa
52.8
16
5.93
0.001 cw
5.5
GCF08.X
X
X-4
90.4
5.5
16.31
0.001 gw
2.3
GCF08.XIV
XIV♂
XIV-4_sa
82.3
14
4.42
0.005 cw
2.8
GCF08.XVIII
XVIII
XVII_9om_sa_pI
43.9
47
2.83
0.043 cw
3.5
GCF08 total sum of explained variance
40.9
Growth cessation in field conditions year 2009 (GCF09)
GCF09.Ib
Ib
XVI_18_sa
80.2
14.5
4.75
0.004 cw
4.9
GCF09.II.1
II♂-1
II-Ib_pI
11.0
26
4.02
0.001 cw
7.0
GCF09.II.2
II♂-2
II_33_sa
43.1
17
4.82
0.004 cw
2.4
GCF09.II.3
II♂-2
II_35_sa
84.8
13
6.15
0.001 cw
6.2
GCF09.III
III
III-4_sa
23.8
29
2.95
0.047 cw
3.2
GCF09.V
V♂
V_5_sa
52.8
55
3.15
0.032 cw
1.2
GCF09.IX
IX
IX_8_sa
75.2
22.9
3.82
0.007 cw
4.2
GCF09.X
X
X-4
91.4
5.5
8.55
0.002 gw
10.7
GCF09.XIV
XIV♂
XIV-4_sa
82.3
7.5
5.50
0.001 cw
1.4
GCF09.XVIII
XVIII
XVIII_8_sa
39.7
51.5
2.88
0.042 cw
2.1
GCF09.Ib × GCF09.XVIII
 
 
 
 
 
5.8
GCF total sum of explained variance
49.1
Leaf senescence in field conditions year 2009 (LSF09)
LSF09.Ib
Ib
SB265
219.5
23
4.34
0.007 cw
1.6
LSF09.II
II♂-2
II_35_sa
84.8
4
32.11
0.001 gw
34.2
LSF09.III
III
III-14_sa
87.1
36
3.57
0.018 cw
excl
LSF09.IV
IV
Ro11
21.6
38
3.0
0.030 cw
excl
LSF09.VI.1
VI-1
VI-3d
4.3
10.5
3.32
0.023 cw
1.2
LSF09.VI.2
VI-2
Sa_con27_PopI
8.4
10.5
8.11
0.001 gw
3.7
LSF09.VII
VII
VII_1_sa
1.0
6
6.18
0.001 gw
4.3
LSF09.VIII.1
VIII-2
VIII_3_sa
27.7
23
3.30
0.005 cw
1.6
LSF09.VIII.2
VIII-3
VIII_5_sa
4.0
15.5
7.55
0.001 gw
5.6
LSF09.X
X
X-4
88.4
6.5
20.49
0.001 gw
2.2
LSF09.XI
XI
R_52_sa
4.5
91
3.14
0.021 cw
1.1
LSF09.XIV
XIV ♀
XIV-12_sa
30.0
34.7
2.47
0.030 cw
1.0
LSF09 total sum of explained variance
56.5
Leaf senescence in field conditions year 2010 (LSF 2010)
LSF10.II
II♂-2
II-12_sa
89.6
5.5
16.89
0.001gw
19.3
LSF10.III
III
III-18_sa
118.6
15.5
6.35
0.003 gw
6.0
LSF10.IV
IV
Ph30
95.3
30.9
2.88
0.034 cw
2.3
LSF10.V
V♂
V_10_sa
59.4
28.5
3.64
0.005 cw
5.0
LSF10.VI
VI-1
VI-3d
4.3
12.5
2.94
0.049 cw
1.8
LSF10.VII
VII
VII_1_sa
1.0
26
2.73
0.047 cw
1.4
LSF10.VIII
VIII-3
VIII_5_sa
4.0
45.5
2.91
0.002 cw
1.8
LSF10.X
X
X-4
88.4
8.5
10.49
0.001 gw
1.8
LSF10.XII
XII
XII-4d
63.7
45.5
3.22
0.016 cw
1.2
LSF10.XIV.1
XIV♀
XIV-9_sa
22.8
20
6.73
0.001 gw
3.2
LSF10.XIV.2
XIV♂
XIV-14_sa
135.8
45.3
4.60
0.030 gw
excl
LSF10.B
B
VI_22_sa
12.0
41.5
4.51
0.037 gw
excl
LSF10 total sum of explained variance 43.8

aThe closest SNP marker to the QTL peak position, also used in multiple QTL mapping, and in mixed model and variance components analyses. When the closest marker to peak position was not a SNP, the AFLP marker is reported in brackets. bQTL position on the S1 linkage map [35]. cHeuristic support interval determined as a 1.5-unit drop off on either side of the local LOD score peak. dProbability for the null hypothesis of no QTL obtained after 5,000 permutations. ePercentage of variance explained by the QTL or by the QTL × QTL interaction estimated by variance components analysis. gw Genome-wide, significant QTL. cw Chromosome-wide, suggestive QTL. excl QTL excluded from the complete model following a backward selection procedure at a test level of 0.05 (see Methods for details).