Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 3;15:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-63

Table 4.

CNVs detected using WGS and genomic microarrays

Strain Position (Micr.) Position (Seq.) Presumed relevant gene Copy number (Seq.) Orientation (Seq.)
all 3D7 derived lines
chr12_974243-975980
chr12_974276-976007
pfgch
2
tandem
all Dd2 derived lines
chr5_892863-968421
chr5_892872-968429
pfmdr1
2
tandem
all Dd2 derived lines
chr12_970985-975864
chr12_971011-975866
pfgch
2
tandem
Evo5a/b
chr1_428540-643352
chr1_428538-643350
pfmrp1
2
unknown*
CladoR_clone1
chr13_1996541-2018534
chr13_1996635-2018727
pfkrs1
3
tandem
CladoR_clone2
chr13_1996668-2055132
chr13_1996621-2055107
pfkrs1
3
tandem
CladoR_clone3
chr13_2001466-2051201
chr13_2001482-2051233
pfkrs1
3
tandem
NITD678_clone1 chr12_510069-633784 chr12_510123-633834 pfatp4 2-3 tandem

*Orientation could not be determined as the amplification continued into the telomeric region.

Predicted CNV calls with position from both WGS (Seq.) using Platypus and microarray data (Micr.), with predicted copy number compared to the 3D7 reference and orientation of the amplification as determined by Platypus.