Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 30;15(2):293–304. doi: 10.1007/s10162-013-0437-5

TABLE 3.

Slopes (in dB/mm) and significance of relationships between thresholds and EMML distance for PA, TP, BP, and MP on a per subject basis

Research ID PA TP BP MP
Slope dB/mm Significance Slope dB/mm Significance Slope dB/mm Significance Slope dB/mm Significance
S36 19.75 0.00004 *** DNT 21.39 0.00004 *** 2.72 0.00031 ***
S38 10.57 0.00011 *** DNT DNT 1.03 0.00270 **
S40 4.59 0.00949 ** 4.59 0.03516 * 3.50 0.02279 * 0.10 0.88755
S41 6.77 0.05950 DNT DNT 2.88 0.00154 **
S54 7.03 0.27515 DNT 1.74 0.80292 1.94 0.14521
S55 −0.70 0.69947 −0.25 0.82623 7.12 0.03165 * 1.58 0.07882
S66 9.73 0.00098 *** DNT DNT 1.58 0.14200
S80 24.07 0.00002 *** 25.06 0.00024 *** 17.32 0.00015 *** 4.13 0.08621
S89 15.73 0.00225 ** 22.76 0.00001 *** 14.09 0.00019 *** −1.04 0.34784
S101 9.50 0.00755 ** 11.44 0.00290 ** 4.20 0.09962 3.63 0.00046 ***
Mean 10.70 12.72 9.91 1.86
% significant 70 % 80 % 71 % 40 %

The table shows subject significance of the slope with p value listed as well as asterisks indicating different significance thresholds (***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05). The last row indicates what percent of subjects per condition met the significance threshold of 0.05

DNT did not test