Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 28;15(2):187–202. doi: 10.1007/s10162-013-0440-x

TABLE 2.

Multiple regression analyses

Partial contribution Total
Packing density Perikaryal area
PD R 2 P R 2 P R 2 P
Maximum amplitudea 20 0.15 0.37 0.15 0.37 0.30 0.071
50 0.13 0.40 0.10 0.50 0.23 0.14
Slopeb 20 0.43 0.038 0.18 0.29 0.61 0.0014
50 0.48 0.027 -0.03 0.85 0.46 0.014
Thresholda 20 0.14 0.41 0.21 0.24 0.35 0.041
50 0.00 0.96 0.00 0.95 0.00 1.0
Dynamic rangea 20 0.19 0.28 0.30 0.12 0.49 0.0066
50 0.22 0.17 -0.02 0.90 0.21 0.17
Level50% a 20 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.17 0.47 0.008
50 0.49 0.019 -0.04 0.74 0.45 0.012
Latencya 20 0.19 0.27 0.38 0.052 0.57 0.0017
50 0.40 0.012 0.41 0.011 0.80 < 0.001

For each eCAP characteristic separately, and for short and long PD, the difference as a result of IPG increase from 2.1 to 30 μs is put in a multiple regression model with SGC perikaryal area and packing density as predictors

a N = 18

b N = 17