TABLE 2.
Partial contribution | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Packing density | Perikaryal area | ||||||
PD | R 2 | P | R 2 | P | R 2 | P | |
Maximum amplitudea | 20 | 0.15 | 0.37 | 0.15 | 0.37 | 0.30 | 0.071 |
50 | 0.13 | 0.40 | 0.10 | 0.50 | 0.23 | 0.14 | |
Slopeb | 20 | 0.43 | 0.038 | 0.18 | 0.29 | 0.61 | 0.0014 |
50 | 0.48 | 0.027 | -0.03 | 0.85 | 0.46 | 0.014 | |
Thresholda | 20 | 0.14 | 0.41 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 0.041 |
50 | 0.00 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 1.0 | |
Dynamic rangea | 20 | 0.19 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.12 | 0.49 | 0.0066 |
50 | 0.22 | 0.17 | -0.02 | 0.90 | 0.21 | 0.17 | |
Level50% a | 20 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.17 | 0.47 | 0.008 |
50 | 0.49 | 0.019 | -0.04 | 0.74 | 0.45 | 0.012 | |
Latencya | 20 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 0.052 | 0.57 | 0.0017 |
50 | 0.40 | 0.012 | 0.41 | 0.011 | 0.80 | < 0.001 |
For each eCAP characteristic separately, and for short and long PD, the difference as a result of IPG increase from 2.1 to 30 μs is put in a multiple regression model with SGC perikaryal area and packing density as predictors
a N = 18
b N = 17