Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Nov 22;22(2):210–217. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.11.003

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Congruency during WM and AH in all anatomical regions. Smaller values indicate more congruent surfaces. A – most congruent point (minimum RMS value) during WM. B – most congruent point (minimum RMS value) during AH. C – average congruency (average RMS value) during WM. D – average congruency (average RMS value) during AH. Dysplastic hips were significantly less congruent in some unloaded regions. However, there were no significant differences in the primary load-bearing regions. Error bars indicate upper confidence bounds (at 95%). * = p < 0.05 in comparison to normal hips during the same loading scenario (n = 10 in each group).