Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 27;9(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1940-0640-9-2

Table 4.

Prevalence of inconsistency between screening results based on AUDIT-C scores and reported drinking on the same AUDIT-C in men and women

 
US general population sample
VA outpatient sample
        (N = 26,610) (N = 467,416)
Men
Positive screen based on AUDIT-C score
AUDIT-C score
% reporting < recommended limits
Total
Q#1
Q#2
Q#3
%
(95% CI)
%
(95% CI)
4
3
1
0
2.3
(2.1–2.6)
1.0
(1.0-1.0)
4
4
0
0
5.4
(5.1–5.8)
12.9
(12.7–13.0)
5
4
1
0
1.1
(0.9–1.3)
1.9
(1.8–1.9)
All inconsistent positive screens
8.9*
(8.4–9.4)
15.8
(15.6–15.8)
Negative screen based on AUDIT-C score
AUDIT-C score
% reporting > recommended limits
Total
Q#1
Q#2
Q#3
%
(95% CI)
%
(95% CI)
2
1
0
1
1.1
(0.9–1.2)
2.0
(2.0–2.0)
3
1
1
1
2.0
(1.7–2.2)
0.6
(0.6–0.6)
3
1
0
2
0
--
0.3
(0.3–0.3)
3
1
2
0
0
--
0.1
(0.01-0.1)
3
2
0
1
1.9
(1.7–2.2)
2.3
(2.2–2.3)
All inconsistent negative screens
4.9
(4.6–5.3)
5.3
(5.2–5.3)
All inconsistent negative & positive screens
13.8
(13.2–14.4)
21.1
(20.9–21.1)
Women
Positive screen based on AUDIT-C score
AUDIT-C score
% reporting < recommended limits **
Total
Q#1
Q#2
Q#3
%
(95% CI)
%
(95% CI)
3
2
1
0
2.6
(2.4–2.9)
1.5
(1.3–1.7)
3
3
0
0
8.2
(7.7–8.6)
8.1
(7.7–8.5)
4
3
1
0
1.6
(1.4–1.8)
0.6
(0.5–0.8)
4
4
0
0
5.0
(4.6–5.4)
7.2
(6.8–7.6)
All inconsistent positive screens
17.5*
(16.8–18.1)
17.4
(16.9–18.0)
Negative screen based on AUDIT-C score
AUDIT-C score
% reporting > recommended limits
Total
Q#1
Q#2
Q#3
%
(95% CI)
%
(95% CI)
2
1
0
1
0.8
(0.7–1.0)
3.3
(3.0–3.6)
All inconsistent negative screens
0.8
(0.7–1.0)
3.3
(3.0–3.6)
All inconsistent negative & positive screens 18.3* (17.7–18.9) 20.7 (20.1–21.3)

*Numbers do not add up to totals due to rounding.

**All negative screens with report of risky drinking were due to heavy episodic drinking (≥5 drinks in a day).