Table 2.
Case | Eye | Intended Laser Ablation Depth (μm)* | Retreatment Ablation Depth (μm) | Actual Central Ablation Depth (μm) | Simulated OCT Ablation Depth | Central Ablation Difference (%) | Peripheral Ablation Difference (%) | Central Island Height (μm) | Central Island (%) | Central Epithelial Thickness (CET, μm) | Peripheral Epithelial Thickness (PET, μm) | CET- PET (μm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | OS | 94 | NA | 136 | 108.8 | −61.9% | −131.7% | 17.8 | 30.6% | 63.5 | 49 | 14.5 |
2 | OD | 75 | NA | 75 | 97.1 | 0.0% | −19.6% | 13.0 | 22.7% | 61 | 59.5 | 1.5 |
3 | OD | 128 | NA | 153.5 | 136.0 | −46.2% | −40.6% | −4.6 | −4.6% | 77.75 | 71.25 | 6.5 |
4 | OD | 174** | 77 | 160 | 202.5 | −2.3% | −11.2% | 8.0 | 8.9% | 56 | 56 | 0 |
5 | OD | 149** | 43 | 187 | 180.0 | −34.5 | −30.1 | 7.6 | 5.9 | 76 | 44.35 | 31.75 |
5 | OS | 177 | NA | 154 | 229.3 | 13.0 | 6.1% | 12.1 | 8.9% | 66.5 | 48.5 | 18 |
6 | OS | 84 | NA | 98 | 107.4 | −18.2 | −36.1% | 9.6 | 15.0% | 55 | 61.75 | −6.75 |
7 | OD | 87 | NA | 152 | 112.7 | −74.7 | −101.2% | −0.2 | −0.4% | 62 | 65 | −3 |
8 | OD | 100 | NA | 158.5 | 146.1 | −40.5 | −55.0% | 11.0 | 12.3% | 85.5 | 50.75 | 34.75 |
nominal laser setting
ablation depth from primary treatment and retreatment were added