Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Nov 11;20(3):754–763. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1960

Table 3.

Comparison of accuracy of model-based IV busulfan dose predictions by model and age group to achieve the therapeutic window for busulfan Css of 592 – 963 ng/mL

Age (years) % in therapeutic window by method (p-valuea)
Age-and size-dependent model FDAb EMA
All (N=1610c) 72% 57% (<.0001) 70% (0.214)
≥ 20 (N=128) 82% 83% (0.87) 84% (0.616)
15 to <20 (N=224) 76% 78% (0.575) 80% (0.305)
10 to <15 (N=238) 77% 68% (0.031) 65% (0.005)
5 to <10 (N=249) 78% 49% (<.0001) 71% (0.081)
2 to <5 (N=304) 70% 33% (<.0001) 71% (0.79)
1 to <2 (N=210) 69% 54% (0.001) 72% (0.521)
< 1 (N=256) 62% 54% (0.060) 61% (0.785)
a

p-value from chi-squared analysis of the number of patients within the therapeutic window by dosing method compared to age- and size-dependent model.

b

The product labeling doses for Q6h dosing frequency are as follows: FDA dosing is 1.1 mg/kg for ≤ 12 kg and 0.8 mg/kg for >12 kg. EMA dosing is 1 mg/kg for <9kg, 1.2mg/kg for 9 to <16kg, 1.1mg/kg for 16 to 23kg, 0.95mg/kg for >23 to 34 kg, and 0.8mg/kg for >34 kg. COG trials AAML03P1 and AAML0531 recommended initial busulfan doses for Q6h dosing frequency: 0.8mg/kg for <10kg, 1mg/kg for ≥10 kg and ≤4 years old, 0.8 mg/kg for >4 years old.

c

Age was unavailable for one patient.