Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Nov 11;20(3):678–687. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1660

Figure 2. PET imaging with a 64Cu-labeled anti-CD99 antibody compared to 18F-FDG.

Figure 2

A. Mice with A673 (CD99+) xenografts (white arrows) were injected with either 64Cu-DN16 or 64Cu-IgG and PET imaged 24 h post-injection. Quantitated data plotted as mean +/- SEM for n=5 animals. B. Mice with TC32 (CD99+) xenografts on the left and Kelly (CD99-) xenografts on the right were PET imaged one hour after injection of 18F-FDG PET. Data plotted as mean +/- SEM for n=3 animals. C. The same mice were injected with 64Cu-DN16 and PET imaged 24 h after injection. Data plotted as mean +/- SEM for n=3 animals. Significance determined by the Student's t-test.