Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 5;17(1):18808. doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.1.18808

Table 2.

Comparison of HIV incidence rates for demographic risk factors using bivariable Poisson regression models (n=957)

Number Number SC Risk ratio (95% CI) p-value*
Province
 Maputo 499 20
 Gaza 458 21 1.27 (0.69–2.34) 0.45
Age (years) 947 41 0.93 (0.87–0.99) 0.02
Age category (years)
 18–19 164 10
 20–24 341 16 0.67 (0.31–1.52) 0.36
 25–29 218 10 0.71 (0.30–1.71) 0.44
 30–34 138 4 0.44 (0.14–1.40) 0.16
  > 34 86 1 0.17 (0.02–1.33) 0.09
Marital status
 Married or living together 665 24
 Divorced/separated/widow/single 200 10 1.37 (0.66–2.87) 0.40
 Relationship but not living with partner 90 7 2.13 (0.92–4.95) 0.08
Polygamous marriage
 No 508 17
 Yes 86 5 1.75 (0.64–4.73) 0.27
Number of children
  < 3 455 26
  ≥ 3 493 14 0.48 (0.25–0.93) 0.03
Educational level
 Less than primary education 617 26
 Primary education or higher 340 15 0.99 (0.52–1.86) 0.96
Partner educational level
 Less than primary education 407 10
 Primary education or higher 407 22 2.10 (1.01–4.50) 0.05
Ever had a job
 No 806 34
 Yes 142 7 1.14 (0.50–2.57) 0.76
Partner employment
 No job 167 6
 Employee 208 3 1.71 (0.61–4.80) 0.31
 Mineworker 225 8 0.38 (0.09–1.51) 0.17
 Other 101 5 1.02 (0.35–2.93) 0.98
 Own business 149 9 1.23 (0.36–4.03) 0.73
Partner works out >4 weeks
 No 604 28
 Yes 324 10 0.67 (0.32–1.38) 0.27

SC, seroconversion; CI, confidence interval.

*

p-values from Poisson regression models (i.e. generalized linear models using the Poisson distribution with the log link and an offset accounting for person-years).

Boldfaces means significant (p<0.05).