Table 3. Univariate analysis of the variables associated with Toxoplasma gondii diseases.
Case patients | Control subjects | Crude Odds Ratio | ||
Variable | (N = 30) | (N = 224) | (95% Confidence interval) | p-value |
Educational level | ||||
High school and below | 16 | 81 | 2.2 (0.9–5.1) | 0.079 |
College and above | 14 | 143 | 1.0 | |
Blood group type | ||||
O | 16 | 94 | 1.0 | 0.744 |
A | 7 | 65 | 0.6 (0.2–1.7) | |
B | 5 | 43 | 0.7 (0.2–2.1) | |
AB | 2 | 22 | 0.6 (0.1–2.7) | |
Valley water consumption | ||||
Yes | 3 | 20 | 1.2 (0.3–5.1) | 0.769 |
No | 27 | 204 | 1.0 | |
Undercooked beef consumption | ||||
Yes | 12 | 62 | 1.8 (0.8–3.9) | 0.149 |
No | 18 | 162 | 1.0 | |
Undercooked lamb meat consumption | ||||
Yes | 2 | 8 | 1.9 (0.4–9.7) | 0.397 |
No | 28 | 216 | 1.0 | |
Undercooked pork meat consumption | ||||
Yes | 1 | 8 | 0.9 (0.1–7.4) | 0.943 |
No | 29 | 216 | 1.0 | |
Raw fish consumption | ||||
Yes | 22 | 152 | 1.4 (0.6–3.5) | 0.418 |
No | 8 | 72 | 1.0 | |
Raw oyster consumption | ||||
Yes | 10 | 58 | 1.5 (0.6–3.4) | 0.349 |
No | 20 | 166 | 1.0 | |
Raw clam consumption | ||||
Yes | 7 | 15 | 3.6 (1.4–9.3) | 0.008 |
No | 23 | 209 | 1.0 | |
Uncooked vegetables consumption | ||||
Yes | 23 | 164 | 1.5 (0.5–3.9) | 0.459 |
No | 7 | 60 | 1.0 | |
Cats in the neighborhood | ||||
Yes | 21 | 136 | 1.6 (0.7–3.7) | 0.620 |
No | 9 | 88 | 1.0 | |
Cat in the household | ||||
Yes | 8 | 30 | 2.8 (1.1–7.3) | 0.040 |
No | 22 | 194 | 1.0 | |
Gardening or agriculture | ||||
Yes | 15 | 75 | 2.2 (0.97–5.1) | 0.058 |
No | 15 | 149 | 1.0 | |
Blood transfusion | ||||
Yes | 5 | 21 | 1.96 (0.7–5.8) | 0.224 |
No | 25 | 203 | 1.0 | |
Travel | ||||
Yes | 8 | 36 | 2.1 (0.8–5.5) | 0.110 |
No | 22 | 188 | 1.0 | |
Living abroad (>3 months) | ||||
Yes | 1 | 9 | 1.0 | 0.843 |
No | 29 | 215 | 1.2 (0.2–10.2) | |
HIV-positive† | ||||
Yes | 5 | 0 | 53.8 (7.3–infinity)§ | <0.0001§ |
No | 12 | 131 | 1.0 |
Only 17 cases had a known HIV status.
Odds ratios and p values were computed using exact conditional logistic regression due to sparse data.