Table 7. Sleep quality as a mediator in the relationships between negative affect and daydreaming, and negative affect and mind wandering.
Model 1a | |||||||
IV | mediator | DV | IV β | Mediator β | Age β | Gender β | |
Path c | NA | − | DF | .418*** | − | −.037 | −.076 |
Path a | NA | PSQI Global | − | .371*** | − | .048 | .035 |
Paths b and c’ | NA | PSQI Global | DF | .333*** | .227*** | −.048 | −.084 |
Final Model: R = .471; adjusted R2 = .210; F(4, 265) = 18.849; Indirect effect (a * b): bias corrected† 95% C.I. = .0432 to .1849 | |||||||
Model 1b | |||||||
IV | mediator | DV | IV β | Mediator β | Age β | Gender β | |
Path c | NA | − | MW | .338*** | − | .001 | −.018 |
Path a | NA | PSQI Global | − | .371*** | − | .048 | .035 |
Paths b and c’ | NA | PSQI Global | MW | .220*** | .316*** | −.014 | −.029 |
Final Model: R = .448; adjusted R2 = .188; F(4, 265) = 16.600; Indirect effect (a * b): bias corrected 95% C.I. = .0667 to .1985 | |||||||
Model 2a | |||||||
IV | mediator | DV | IV β | Mediator β | Age β | Gender β | |
Path c | DF | − | NA | .407*** | − | .165** | .024 |
Path a | DF | PSQI Global | − | .347*** | − | .102 | .06 |
Paths b and c’ | DF | PSQI Global | NA | .320*** | .252*** | .140* | .009 |
Final model: R = .503; adjusted R2 = .242; F(4, 265) = 22.441; Indirect effect (a * b): bias corrected 95% C.I. = .0322 to .1267 | |||||||
Model 2b | |||||||
IV | mediator | DV | IV β | Mediator β | Age β | Gender β | |
Path c | MW | − | NA | .328*** | − | .161** | −.002 |
Path a | MW | PSQI Global | − | .393*** | − | .091 | .04 |
Paths b and c’ | MW | PSQI Global | NA | .219*** | .277*** | .135* | −.013 |
Final model: R = .452; adjusted R2 = .192; F(4, 265) = 17.018; Indirect effect (a * b): bias corrected 95% C.I. = .0525 to.1716 |
NA = Negative Affect; DF = Daydream Frequency; PSQI Global = PSQI Global score; MW = Mind Wandering.
Taking account of the difference between the initial and the mean indirect effect estimates.
*p≤.05; **p≤.01; ***p≤.0005.