Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Sep 16;40(1):308–327. doi: 10.1037/a0034353

Table 8.

Summary of Qualitative Differences Between Experiment 1 and Experiment 2

Experiment 1 Experiment 2
Curvefits
  • CI users delayed relative to NH controls in fixations to all items

  • CI users have fewer target fixations than NH controls

  • CI users have more late fixations to all competitors than NH controls

  • CIS group delayed relative to NS controls only in target and cohort fixations

  • CIS group and NS controls have equal target fixations

  • CIS group has more late rhyme and unrelated fixations than NS controls

Early sensitivity to the signal
  • CI users slower to activate relevant item than NH controls

  • CIS group slower to activate relevant item than NS controls

Competitor suppression
  • CI users and NH controls equally fast to suppress competitor once it had been activated

  • CIS group and NS controls equally fast to suppress competitor once it had been activated

Degree of consideration Peak
  • Both groups fixated cohort more than unrelated

  • Both groups fixated rhyme more than unrelated, but CI users showed more rhyme activation than the NH group


RT
  • CI users showed late cohort activation, NH group did not

  • CI users showed late rhyme activation, NH group did not

Peak
  • Both groups fixated cohort more than unrelated

  • Both groups fixated rhyme more than unrelated, but the groups were equal in their degree of rhyme activation


RT
  • Both groups showed late cohort activation equally

  • CIS group showed late rhyme activation, NS group did not