Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr. 2013 Oct 22;164(2):243–246.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.09.030

Table 2.

Comparison of feeding dysfunction and non-feeding dysfunction groups by univariate analysis

No feeding dysfunction Feeding dysfunction P value

Male, n (%) 17 (61) 17 (61) 1

Diagnosis of HLHS, n (%) 7 (25) 12 (43) 0.26

Completed S3P, n (%) 11 (39) 6 (21) 0.24

S1P required, n (%) 12 (43) 14 (50) 0.79

G tube use, n (%) 0.02
 Never 18 (55) 15 (45)
 Former 8 (73) 3 (27)
 Current 2 (17) 10 (83)

Vocal cord injury, n (%) 8 (29) 9 (32) 1

Lower household income, n (%) 15 (54) 16 (59) 0.79

Single parent home, n (%) 4 (14) 11 (39) 0.03

HLHS – hypoplastic left heart syndrome, S3P – stage 3 palliation, S1P – stage 1 palliation. P values obtained by Fisher’s exact test.