Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 10;87:1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.065

Table 1.

Estimation of the information of a subset of regions using linear kernels along with ν-MKL and lp-norm MKL for the simulated dataset. The metrics used to determine the amount of information of the regions by means of ν-MKL (mean of the normalized γ values) and lp-norm MKL (kernel weights’ mean) as well as their selection frequencies for each algorithm are reported. Both the normalized γ values and the kernel weights have been scaled so that their maximum values equal 1 to make the comparison easier. These coefficients are contrasted against the accuracy rates achieved by these regions using a linear SVM.

Region Linear SVM ν-MKL lp-norm MKL

Acc. Rate Sel. Freq. Normalized γ Sel. Freq. Kernel Weights
Square 26 0.81 1 1.00 1 0.91
Square 46 0.78 1 0.95 1 0.91
Square 32 0.77 1 0.99 1 1.00
Square 77 0.76 1 0.91 1 0.72
Square 29 0.76 1 0.76 1 0.67
Square 23 0.76 1 0.71 1 0.81
Square 12 0.75 1 0.75 1 0.53
Square 57 0.69 1 0.54 0.50 0.58
Square 51 0.68 1 0.52 1 0.34
Square 30 0.67 1 0.24 0.50 0.34
Square 107 0.63 0.60 0.08 0.60 0.30
Square 13 0.60 0.60 0.09 0.50 0.38
Square 44 0.57 0.30 0.13 0.90 0.29
Square 37 0.56 0.10 0.09 0.90 0.24
Square 20 0.54 0.10 0.07 0.80 0.22