Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pharm Res. 2013 Aug 16;31(2):360–372. doi: 10.1007/s11095-013-1165-6

Table 3.

Effect of capsule wall coatings on the mean drug deposition and aerosolization performance of CC1-3Dm at a 4 kPa pressure drop. Coefficient of variation (%) is shown in parenthesis [n=3].

Description EEG
formulation
L-leucine Magnesium
stearate
Emitted (%)* 65.3 (3.9) 67.8 (2.6) 72.9 (1.6)**
Capsule retention (%)* 14.2 (12.5) 12.7 (10.7) 9.2 (23.9)**
Capsule chamber retention (%) 7.8 (34.1) 6.7 (17.8) 6.9 (7.3)
Mouthpiece retention (%) 12.7 (28.7) 12.9 (10.1) 11.0 (14.6)
FPF<5µm/ED (%) 95.4 (0.4) 95.2 (0.7) 94.4 (0.4)
FPF<1µm/ED (%) 38.1 (3.7) 36.6 (4.0) 36.0 (1.6)
MMAD (µm) 1.29 (2.75) 1.33 (2.50) 1.35 (0.88)
*

P<0.05 significant effect of capsule wall coatings with EEG formulation, L-leucine and magnesium stearate on % emitted and capsule retention (one-way ANOVA).

**

P<0.05 significant effect of % emitted and capsule retention compared to capsule wall coated with EEG formulation (post-hoc Tukey).

Batch-2 EEG formulation combination particles generated by Büchi Nano Spray Dryer (B-90).