Table 3.
Scenario | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
Probability of selecting an acceptable combination as MTD
| |||||||
BTNL | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.88 | n/a | 0.71 | 0.72 | 0.54 |
Proposed (complete, no stop) | 0.73 | 0.86 | 0.87 | n/a | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.70 |
Proposed (partial, no stop) | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.82 | n/a | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.64 |
Proposed (complete, stop) | 0.62 | 0.75 | 0.73 | n/a | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.49 |
Proposed (partial, stop) | 0.64 | 0.76 | 0.69 | n/a | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.43 |
| |||||||
Probability of selecting no combination as MTD
| |||||||
BTNL | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Proposed (complete, no stop) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Proposed (partial, no stop) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Proposed (complete, stop) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Proposed (partial, stop) | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| |||||||
Mean number of patients enrolled
| |||||||
BTNL | 60.0 | 60.0 | 59.5 | 28.7 | 60.0 | 60.0 | 60.0 |
Proposed (complete, no stop) | 60.0 | 60.0 | 60.0 | 29.0 | 60.0 | 60.0 | 60.0 |
Proposed (partial, no stop) | 60.0 | 60.0 | 60.0 | 29.0 | 60.0 | 60.0 | 60.0 |
Proposed (complete, stop) | 25.6 | 24.6 | 22.4 | 14.5 | 23.4 | 24.3 | 24.3 |
Proposed (partial, stop) | 26.1 | 25.7 | 23.3 | 15.2 | 24.3 | 25.5 | 25.6 |
| |||||||
Observed incidence of toxicity
| |||||||
BTNL | 0.22 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.54 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.33 |
Proposed (complete, no stop) | 0.21 | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.50 | 0.31 | 0.31 | 0.33 |
Proposed (partial, no stop) | 0.21 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.53 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.31 |
Proposed (complete, stop) | 0.18 | 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.52 | 0.28 | 0.30 | 0.29 |
Proposed (partial, stop) | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.34 | 0.52 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.30 |
For 1000 runs, the maximum simulation standard error is approximately 0.016.
BTNL: Braun, Thall, Nguyen, de Lima method.