Bragg [33] |
Maryland |
Prostate cancer |
Cross-sectional |
ND |
Referrals to healthcare |
Hypertension |
Screening |
Cardiovascular disease |
|
Diabetes |
|
General Health |
|
Ferdinand [10] |
Louisiana |
Cardiovascular disease |
Cross-sectional, outreach |
ND |
Screening |
Fraser et al. [18] |
New York |
Prostate cancer |
Needs assessment, pre-test/post-test |
Stages of change |
Testing a prostate cancer education curriculum |
Discussing prostate cancer with customers |
Hart et al. [32] |
Washington |
Prostate cancer |
Cross-sectional, feasibility |
ND |
Feasibility for being engaged in prostate cancer education program |
Hart et al. [17] |
Virginia |
Prostate cancer |
Cross-sectional, feasibility |
ND |
Feasibility for being engaged in prostate cancer education program |
Hess et al. [22] |
Texas |
Hypertension |
Quasi-experimental |
Social cognitive theory |
Blood pressure measurements, peer support, peer approval, peer education |
Holt et al. [19] |
Alabama |
Prostate cancer |
Qualitative, education materials development |
Community-based participatory research and empowerment education |
Engagement with materials development, input on cultural appropriateness, acceptability, and understandability |
Colorectal cancer |
Hypertension/Diabetes (control conditions) |
Lewis et al. [31] |
North Carolina |
STD/HIV |
Needs assessment |
Social cognitive theory |
Delivery of peer education, condom distribution |
Li et al. [28] |
North Carolina |
General health |
Cross-sectional, feasibility |
ND |
Feasibility for being engaged in health education program |
Linnan et al. [29] |
North Carolina |
Physical activity |
Cross-sectional, feasibility |
ND |
Delivery of peer education, physical measurements |
Luque et al. [30] |
Florida |
Prostate cancer |
Pre-test/post-test, feasibility |
Empowerment education |
Feasibility for barber engagement in prostate cancer education program, receiving prostate cancer curriculum instruction |
Luque et al. [20] |
Florida |
Prostate cancer |
One-shot case study, feasibility |
Empowerment education |
Educating customers about prostate cancer screening |
Pepe [34] |
Ohio |
Hypertension |
One-shot case study, outreach |
ND |
Blood pressure measurements, peer education |
Releford et al. [7, 14] |
California, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Missouri, New York |
Hypertension |
Outreach |
Social ecological model |
Peer education, health screenings (blood pressure, blood glucose), referrals to healthcare |
Cardiovascular disease |
Diabetes |
Victor et al. [27] |
Texas |
Hypertension |
Randomized controlled trial design description |
CDC AIDS community demonstration project model |
Blood pressure measurements, peer support, peer approval, peer education, referrals to healthcare |
Victor et al. [21] |
Texas |
Hypertension |
Randomized controlled trial |
CDC AIDS community demonstration project model |
Blood pressure measurements, peer support, peer approval, peer education, referrals to healthcare |