Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Nov 15;20(1):246–252. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2098

Table 3.

distribution of the stage of development, the decrease of TGR and the tumor response (RECIST) across the different trials

Investigational regimen Decrease of TGR* RECIST Evaluation Total number of patients (N) Current development status
Progressive Disease (N) Stable Disease (N) Partial Response (N)
Trial # 1: HSP inhib. Not Significant 3 5 0 8 Stopped
Trial # 2: HSP inhib. Not Significant 10 11 0 21 Ongoing
Trial # 3: Cell-Cycle inhib. Not Significant 3 9 0 12 Stopped
Trial # 4: PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhib. Not Significant 2 7 0 9 Ongoing
Trial # 5: Antiangiogenic Not Significant 3 4 1 8 Ongoing
Trial # 6: HDAC inhib. Not Significant 9 11 0 20 Ongoing
Trial # 7: PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhib. Significant 3 7 2 12 Ongoing
Trial # 8: MEK inhib. Significant 3 8 2 13 Stopped
Trial # 9: Antiangiogenic Significant 3 9 2 14 Ongoing
Trial # 10: HER family inhibitor Significant 6 11 0 17 Stopped
Trial # 11: Antiangiogenic Significant 3 15 2 20 Ongoing
Trial # 12: PI3K/Akt/mTOR inhib. Significant 2 14 3 19 Ongoing
*

Significance of the decrease of TGR between the REFRENCE and the EXPERIMENTAL period (pairwise comparison, wilcoxon signed-rank test).