Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: NMR Biomed. 2013 Oct 16;27(2):116–128. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3040

Table 1.

The averaged values estimated using different kinetic models, across five ROIs in the gray matter in different brain regions from ten healthy subjects, along with the paired statistical comparisons between groups.

model CBF (mL/100g/min) ATT (s) T1,eff (s) R2 of fit AICc of fit BIC of fit
2p_1.2s 57±16 1.5±0.3 1.2 0.76±0.13 310±15 310±15
2p_1.6s 47±13 1.4±0.3 1.6 0.82±0.09 307±17 306±17
2p_2.0s 42±11 1.4±0.3 2.0 0.82±0.08 307±17 306±17
3p 46±14 1.4±0.3 1.9±0.4 0.84±0.08 312±18 311±18
4p 44±13 1.4±0.3 0.84±0.08 319±19 315±18
5p 44±13 1.4±0.3 0.83±0.09 328±19 320±18
P values from paired t-test
(2p_1.2s, 2p_1.6s) 1.6×10−26 3.2×10−32 7.8×10−9 1.3×10−4 6.9×10−5
(2p_1.6s, 2p_2.0s) 1.7×10−27 3.9×10−29 0.18 0.81 0.97
(2p_2.0s, 3p) 1.1×10−4 2.3×10−3 9.5×10−10 8.8×10−12 5.4×10−9
(3p, 4p) 8.8×10−4 0.12 0.27 1.2×10−22 1.4×10−15
(4p, 5p) 0.15 0.86 9.6×10−6 6.4×10−36 1.4×10−24