Table 4.
Neuropsychological Composite | Correlation with SCT | Multiple regression modelsa
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Inattention
|
Hyp-Imp
|
SCT
|
R2 | F | ||
B [95% CI] | B [95% CI] | B [95% CI] | ||||
Full Scale IQ | .37*** | .34 [.23, .45]*** | −.02 [−.11, .07] | .14 [.05, .23]** | .195 | 57.2*** |
Processing Speed | .39*** | .38 [.27, .49]*** | .04 [−.04, .12] | .15 [.07, .23]** | .259 | 82.3*** |
Naming Speed | .34*** | .29 [.17, .41]*** | −.03 [−.12, .06] | .16 [.08, .24]*** | .171 | 47.9*** |
Sustained Attention | .33*** | .16 [.04, .28]*b | .02 [−.08, .11] | .20 [.10, .30]*** | .112 | 26.4*** |
Inhibition | .29*** | .27 [.14, .41]*** | .13 [.03, .23]* | .10 [−.01, .21] | .163 | 42.1*** |
Working Memory | .26*** | .22 [.12, .36]*** | .03 [−.06, .12] | .09 [−.01, .19] | .126 | 29.6*** |
Response Variability | .29*** | .29 [.15, .43]*** | .05 [−.05, .15] | .10 [.00, .20] | .141 | 32.9*** |
Note: N = 716. All measures are scaled so that a positive B indicates an association between higher levels of SCT and ADHD and greater neuropsychological weakness.
point estimates from amodel in which inattention, hyperactivity-impulsivity, and SCT were entered simultaneously as independent variables. Full scale IQ and symptoms of MDD, GAD, ODD, and CD were then entered simultaneously as covariates in a second step (Supplement Table 4).
the effect was not significant after FSIQ and symptoms of MDD, GAD, ODD, and CD were added (P > .05).
= p < .05,
= P < .01,
= P < .001