Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Radiol. 2013 Dec 11;24(4):850–856. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-3081-x

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Comparison of the distribution of time-averaged (left) and peaks systolic WSS (right). A: Comparison of segmental WSS for all patients with femoral wall abnormalities (wall thickening, loose matrix, lipid rich, calcified plaque) versus patients with no femoral wall abnormalities. B: Comparison of segmental WSS for all patients with femoral plaque versus patients with no femoral wall abnormalities. * = significant difference, P < 0.05