Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Res Methods. 2014 Jun;46(2):488–498. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0391-5

Table 1.

Confirmatory factor analysis of different measurement models of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.

χ ² df CFI TLI RMSEA Cfit of RMSEA

Model 1. One trait factor: no correlated uniqueness*
 Time 1 1188.6 35 .80 .74 .119 <.001 .075
 Time 2 1750.6 35 .73 .65 .146 <.001 .086

Model 2. Two correlating trait factors: positive and negative trait factors*
 Time 1 187.3 34 .97 .97 .044 .986 .026
 Time 2 436.8 34 .94 .92 .072 <.001 .046

Model 3. Two correlating trait factors: an acceptance and an assessment factor**
 Time 1 1195.3 34 .80 .73 .121 <.001 .076
 Time 2 1825.0 34 .72 .63 .152 <.001 .086

Model 4. One trait factor with correlated uniqueness among both positive and negative items*
 Time 1 The model is not identified
 Time 2 The model is not identified

Model 5. One trait factor with correlated uniqueness among negatively worded items*
 Time 1 155.7 25 .98 .96 .047 .723 .023
 Time 2 327.3 25 .95 .91 .073 <.001 .037

Model 6. One trait factor with correlated uniqueness among positively worded items*
 Time 1 68.7 25 .99 .99 .027 1.000 .015
 Time 2 181.5 25 .98 .96 .052 .284 .031

Model 7. One trait factor and positive and negative latent method factors*
 Time 1 66.2 25 .99 .99 .027 1.000 .013
 Time 2 151.7 25 .98 .96 .047 .736 .026

Model 8. One trait factor plus a negative method factor*
 Time 1 180.2 30 .97 .96 .046 .819 .024
 Time 2 386.6 30 .94 .92 .072 <.001 .039

Model 9. One trait factor plus a positive method factor*
 Time 1 160.1 30 .98 .97 .043 .957 .022
 Time 2 382.6 30 .94 .92 .072 <.001 .038

Model 10. Five factor model: one trait factor, one acceptance, one assessment factor, positive and negative latent method factors**
 Time 1 34.7 15 1.00 .99 .024 1.000 .009
 Time 2 89.1 15 .99 .97 .046 .717 .012

Note: Time 1 (Wave 2): N=2340 and Time 2 (Wave 3): N=2288.

*

Measurement models are depicted in Figure 1.

**

Tafordi and Milne (2002). χ²=chi-square test statistic; df = degrees of freedom; CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker–Lewis index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation; Cfit = closeness of fit; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual.