Table 4.
Standardized regression weights between predictors and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale latent factors in a longitudinal CFA model.
| Global self-esteem | Positive method factor | Negative method factor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time 1 | Time 2 | Time 1 | Time 2 | Time 1 | Time 2 | |
| Total sample | ||||||
| Genderđ | −0.24*** | −0.20*** | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.14*** | 0.15*** |
| Depression$ | −0.44*** | −0.38*** | 0.10 | −0.01 | 0.36*** | 0.41*** |
| Average grade | 0.01 | 0.04 | −0.05 | −0.12** | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| Relative under-achievement | 0.09** | 0.08* | −0.12* | −0.08 | 0.07 | −0.01 |
| R² | 30% | 24% | 3% | 1% | 17% | 22% |
| Boys | ||||||
| Depression$ | −0.32*** | −0.35*** | −0.04 | −0.08 | 0.38*** | 0.44*** |
| Average grade | −0.04 | −0.02 | −0.02 | −0.07 | −0.03 | 0.03 |
| Relative under-achievement | −0.06 | −0.11* | −0.15 | −0.10 | 0.05 | −0.03 |
| R² | 12% | 15% | 2% | 2% | 16% | 19% |
| Girls | ||||||
| Depression$ | −0.55*** | −0.44*** | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.33*** | 0.40*** |
| Average grade | 0.02 | −0.07 | −0.11 | −0.15 | 0.09 | 0.01 |
| Relative under-achievement | −0.11* | 0.05 | −0.08 | −0.04 | 0.09 | −0.01 |
| R² | 34% | 19% | 4% | 2% | 11% | 16% |
Note:
đ
Boys were coded 0 and girls were coded 1.
$
Measured with the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale.
*
p < .05.
**
p < .01.
***
p < .001.