Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 9.
Published in final edited form as: Eat Behav. 2011 Jan 25;12(2):156–159. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2011.01.004

Table 2.

Correlations between eating in emotional situations (EES), eating behaviors, and food intake among low-income Latino children (n = 159), in addition to the means and standard deviations (sd) of these variables among the boys (n = 71) and girls (n = 88)

Emotion-drivena EES
Context-drivenb EES
Total EES
Mean (sd)c
Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls Boys Girls
Uncontrollable eating .36** .33** .44*** .31** .44*** .35** 1.4 (0.6) 1.2 (0.5)
External eatingd .16 .25 .25 .57*** .23 .45** 1.4 (0.6) 1.1 (0.4)
Fruit intake .02 .01 .01 .09 .02 .05 3.4 (1.1) 3.3 (1.2)
Vegetable intake −.04 .004 .04 .03 −.01 .02 2.6 (1.1) 2.6 (1.0)
Junk food intakee .42* .06 .45** .12 .46** .09 2.0 (0.8) 1.9 (0.8)
Emotion-driven EES 1.9 (1.9) 1.6 (1.9)
Context-driven EES 1.5 (1.6) 1.5 (1.4)
Total EES 3.4 (3.2) 3.1 (3.1)
*

p < 0.05;

**

p < 0.01;

***

p < 0.001

a

Emotion-driven EES refers to eating in emotional situations that are driven by psychological states such as loneliness and anger.

b

Context-driven EES refers to eating in emotional situations that driven by contextual cues such as receiving a bad grade or preparing for a hard test.

c

No significant mean differences by gender were observed.

d

Only data for 70 children were available for this scale (boys: n = 36, girls: n = 34) because the scale was only included on version 2 of the student survey.

e

Only data for 89 children were available for this scale (boys: n = 35, girls: n = 54) because the scale was only included on version 1 of the student survey.