Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 2;15(9):661–667. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12015

Table 2.

Imaging characteristics, biochemical response, imaging response and post-treatment resection

Patient no. Tumour extension at presentation (On imaging) SMA
SMV/PV
Celiac artery
Hepatic artery
CT response to treatment Surgery Comments
Before After Before After Before After Before After
 1 BR U U A A U U U U Stable Yes Involvement based on EUS and intra-operative findings
 2 LA U U A A E E E E Stable No
 3 BR U U A E U A U E Progression No Pre chemo-rad exploration
 4 LA E E E E A E E E Progression No
 5 LA U U E E A E E E Progression No
 6 BR A A A A U U U U Stable Yes Pre chemo-rad exploration
 7 BR U U E E U U U U Stable No Development of Malignant ascites
 8 LA U U E E U U E E Stable No
 9 BR U U E E U U U U Stable No Poor performance status
10 BR U U A A U U U U Stable Yes Excision and replacement of vein.
11 LA U A E E E E E E Progression No
12 BR U U U E U U U U Progression No Pre chemo-rad exploration. Involvement of base of mesentery precluded resection on pre-treatment exploration, Poor performance status precluded resection after treatment
13 BR A A U U U U U U Stable No Pre chemo-rad exploration. Poor performance status precluded resection.
14 LA A A E E E E E E Stable No
15 BR U U A A U U U U Stable Yes Pre chemo-rad exploration
16 BR U U A A U U U U Stable Yes Vein resection

E, encasement; A, abutment; U, uninvolved; BR, borderline resectable; LA, locally advanced; SMA, superior mesenteric artery; NA, not available.