Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 6;4(3):e004107. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004107

Table 2.

Outcomes and effect sizes of interventions to support smoking cessation

Type of outcome Study More intensive intervention Less intensive intervention Comparison Effect
Objective measures
 Biochemically verified smoking cessation Ardron et al19 0 1 (3%)
Canga et al*20 25 (17%) 3 (2%) Incidence ratio (95% CI) 7.5 (2.3 to 24.4)
Hokanson et al*23 4 (7%) 2 (4%) χ2 test for difference in abstinence rate p=0.077
Sawicki et al18 2 (5%) 7 (16%) Difference in point prevalence of cessation Reported as not significant
 Urinary cotinine–creatinine ratio, µg/mg Ardron et al19 7.6 (4.5) 6.7 (4.4)
 Breath CO (µL/L) Ardron et al19 18.2 (10.0) 19.4 (8.9)
 HbA1c <7% (53 mmol/mol) Hokanson et al23 35 (61%) 43 (75%) Difference in proportion of patients achieving HbA1c <7% Reported as not significant
Self-reported measures
 7-day abstinence Ng et al*22 14 (37%) 10 (30%) Allocation effect in logistic regression model Reported as not significant
Thankappan et al*21 58 (52%) 14 (13%) Adjusted OR (95% CI) 8.4 (4.1 to 17.1)
 Number of cigarettes smoked daily Canga et al20 15.5† 18.1† Difference in change in mean cigarettes per day from baseline (95% CI) −3.0 (−1.1 to −4.9)
 >50% reduction in number of cigarettes smoked daily Thankappan et al21 20 (18%) 25 (22%) Adjusted OR (95% CI) 1.9 (0.8 to 4.1)
 Attempts to quit or reduce smoking Ng et al22 21 (55%) 16 (48%) Allocation effect in logistic regression model Reported as not significant
 Incidence of smoking relapse Canga et al20 49 (33%) 14 (11%) Difference (95% CI) in incidence of relapse 22.8% (13.6 to 32.0)

Data presented as number of events (%) or mean (SD).

*Reported as a primary outcome.

†SDs not reported.

CO, carbon monoxide; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin.