Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 10;9(3):e91764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091764

Table 1. Laboratory case definition of acute Q fever patients included in the study (n = 183).

No. Laboratory definition n (%)
1 PCR positive and an IgG phase II and/or IgG phase I seroconversion with at least IgG phase II≥1∶64 in follow-up 46 (25.1)
2 IgG phase II and/or phase I seroconversion with at least IgG phase II≥1∶64 in follow-up 59 (32.2)
3 IgG phase II and/or IgG phase I fourfold increase in antibody titre with at least IgG phase II≥1∶64 in follow-up 9 (4.9)
4 IgM phase II “positive” (untitrated)a or ≥1∶64 and IgG phase II “positive” (untitrated) or ≥1∶64 at diagnosis, and IgG phase II≥1∶64 in follow-up (when available)b 69 (37.7)

No.: number.

a

Due to the large number of samples that were submitted to our laboratory for Q fever diagnostics (over 18,000 samples in 2009), IFA was sometimes not titrated, but only recorded as “positive”.

b

At least one follow-up sample was available for 177/183 (96.7%) patients.