Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan 17;306(6):H825–H832. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00660.2013

Table 1.

Evaluation of cardiac contractile function in Langendorff-perfused mouse hearts

Preischemic Equilibration
End of Reperfusion
Heart Samples n BW, g FR, ml/min HR, beats/min LVDP, cmH2O +dP/dt, cmH2O/ms −dP/dt, cmH2O/ms FR, ml/min HR, beats/min LVDP, cmH2O +dP/dt, cmH2O/ms −dP/dt, cmH2O/ms
I/R-Control 9 27.2 ± 0.6 2.6 ± 0.2 346 ± 18 144 ± 8 8.1 ± 0.5 −5.8 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.2 338 ± 10 33 ± 6 4.2 ± 0.4 −3.4 ± 0.3
PostC 14 26.6 ± 0.5 2.5 ± 0.2 351 ± 12 135 ± 4 8.5 ± 0.3 −5.9 ± 0.2 1.7 ± 0.1 320 ± 11 67 ± 5 5.6 ± 0.3 −4.3 ± 0.2
I/R-SNAP 8 27.9 ± 0.3 2.7 ± 0.2 389 ± 12 125 ± 9 8.0 ± 0.3 −5.2 ± 0.3 1.8 ± 0.1 345 ± 11 54 ± 3* 4.7 ± 0.2 −3.9 ± 0.3
I/R-l-NAME 6 27.2 ± 0.5 2.6 ± 0.1 380 ± 20 147 ± 8 9.1 ± 0.4 −6.2 ± 0.2 2.1 ± 0.2 301 ± 19 44 ± 8 4.2 ± 0.5 −3.7 ± 0.4
l-NAME + PostC 8 26.5 ± 0.6 2.9 ± 0.2 374 ± 11 143 ± 4 9.0 ± 0.4 −6.2 ± 0.4 1.8 ± 0.3 309 ± 13 47 ± 6 4.2 ± 0.5 −3.6 ± 0.4
I/R-ODQ 5 27.3 ± 0.3 2.7 ± 0.3 386 ± 26 129 ± 7 8.1 ± 0.6 −5.5 ± 0.4 1.7 ± 0.2 344 ± 13 30 ± 6 4.0 ± 0.5 −3.3 ± 0.2
ODQ + PostC 7 28.3 ± 0.5 2.5 ± 0.2 379 ± 20 130 ± 7 9.0 ± 0.6 −5.7 ± 0.4 2.0 ± 0.2 334 ± 10 57 ± 4 4.7 ± 0.3 −3.9 ± 0.3
I/R-KT5823 4 27.6 ± 0.3 2.5 ± 0.1 416 ± 24 124 ± 6 8.4 ± 0.6 −5.6 ± 0.3 1.9 ± 0.1 314 ± 11 39 ± 5 3.9 ± 0.3 −3.1 ± 0.4
KT5823 + PostC 5 27.6 ± 0.6 2.4 ± 0.1 408 ± 21 127 ± 5 8.5 ± 0.4 −6.3 ± 0.4 1.9 ± 0.1 344 ± 19 65 ± 3§ 5.5 ± 0.3 −4.0 ± 0.2

Values are means ± SE; n = no. of hearts. BW, body weight; FR, flow rate; HR, heart rate; LVDP, left ventricular developed pressure; ±dP/dt, rates of pressure rise and fall, respectively; I/R, ischemia-reperfusion; SNAP, S-nitroso-N-acetyl-d,l-penicillamine. l-NAME, NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester; ODQ, 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one; PostC, postconditioning;.

*

P < 0.05,

P < 0.01 vs. I/R-control;

P < 0.05 vs. I/R-ODQ;

§

P < 0.05 vs. I/R- KT5823.