Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer. 2014 Feb 1;120(3):425–432. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28434

TABLE 2.

Optimal Cutpoint Analysis using 3 Criteria (N = 2341 Rating Fatigue Severity as 1–10)

Cutpoint Pairsa Wilks lambda Pillai’s trace Hotelling’s trace
2/4 80.8 72.7 89.0
3/4 79.4 71.8 87.2
3/5 94.5 83.3 105.9
3/6b 99.3 87.1 111.9
3/7b 98.7 86.7 111.0
3/8 89.0 79.4 98.8
4/5 88.6 78.7 98.7
4/6 94.8 83.6 106.2
4/7b 96.5 85.1 108.2
4/8 90.9 80.9 101.1
5/6 80.3 72.3 88.5
5/7 84.2 75.5 93.1
5/8 83.9 75.3 92.6
6/7 72.2 65.7 78.8
6/8 73.9 67.2 80.7
7/8 59.5 55.2 63.7
a

The analyses categorize fatigue into 3 groups: mild (from 1 to lower cutpoint), moderate (from lower cutpoint +1 to upper cutpoint) and severe fatigue (from upper cutpoint +1 to 10).

b

Best model fit.