Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2013 Sep 20;32(11):2469–2477. doi: 10.1002/etc.2352

Table 2. Comparison of observed and predicted pyrethroid concentrations.

Monitoring Date Measured Concentration (ng/L) Model Predicted Concentration (ng/L)
Bif Perm Bif Cyf Cyhal Cyper Delta Fenv Perm
2/18/2009 5.6 5.0 6.7 0.9 0.4 1.3 0.6 0 0.7
2/23/2009 ND ND 5.3 0.7 0.4 1.1 0.5 0 0.8
3/3/2009 ND ND 4.6 0.6 0.6 1.1 0.5 0 0.9
10/13/2009 ND ND 4.8 2.9 0.3 1.1 0.6 0 0.9
10/14/2009 ND ND 5.1 3.0 0.3 0.9 0.6 0 0.4
1/18/2010 ND ND 1.4 1.1 0.1 0.5 0.3 0 0.2
1/19/2010 1.8 ND 1.3 1.0 0.1 0.5 0.3 0 0.1
1/20/2010 2.1 ND 1.1 0.9 0.1 0.5 0.3 0 0.2
1/22/2010 ND ND 1.2 1.0 0.1 0.4 0.3 0 0.1
12/18/2010 1.1 ND 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.3 0 0
12/19/2010 1.6 7.0 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.3 0 0

Bif – bifenthrin, Cyf – cyfluthrin/beta cyfluthrin, Cyhal – cyhalothrin/lambda cyhalothrin, Cyper – cypermethrin, Delta – deltamethrin, Fenv – fenvalerate/esfenvalerate, Perm - permethrin

ND – not detected at or above 1 ng/L; predicted concentrations less than 1 ng/L can be considered non-detections

Measured concentration data from [2]