Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 11;9(3):e91528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091528

Table 7. Comparison of R2, AIC and Moran’s I values between OLS models and spatial regressions.

Water quality parameters R2 AIC Moran’s I
NH4 +-N OLS 0.739 31.813 −0.29
Spatial lag 0.745 33.546 −0.28
Spatial error 0.793 29.568 −0.24
SRP OLS 0.716 −34.402 −0.31
Spatial lag 0.719 −32.54 −0.28
Spatial error 0.747 −35.500 −0.24
CODMn OLS 0.711 67.929 −0.25
Spatial lag 0.713 69.856 −0.25
Spatial error 0.763 65.436 −0.12
NO3 N OLS 0.767 50.399 0.06
Spatial lag 0.833 47.305 −0.16
Spatial error 0.846 45.967 0.12
Cl OLS 0.587 113.39 −0.25
Spatial lag 0.797 106.346 −0.25
Spatial error 0.707 110.047 0.05
Na+ OLS 0.530 93.660 −0.17
Spatial lag 0.664 91.319 −0.15
Spatial error 0.647 90.483 −0.08
Mg2+ OLS 0.360 96.857 −0.41
Spatial lag 0.365 98.766 −0.39
Spatial error 0.568 92.963 −0.39
K+ OLS 0.774 65.727 0.09
Spatial lag 0.869 60.085 −0.24
Spatial error 0.833 62.930 0.16