. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 12.

Published in final edited form as: Psychosom Med. 2013 Oct 25;75(9):882–893. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000005

Table 3.

Summary of significant indirect effects from path model

INDIRECT Effects: estimate(CI)	White Men		White Women
	Unstandardized path coefficient	% change in CRP	Unstandardized path coefficient	% change in CRP
Income->BMI->CRP	.006 (−.002, .014)	0.6	−.02 (−.03, −.01) ^**	−2.0
Education ->BMI->CRP	.006 (−.03, .04)	0.6	−.04 (−.07, −.01) ^**	−3.9
Parent Education->BMI->CRP	−.05 (−.08, −.02) ^***	−4.9	−.05 (−.09, −.02) ^***	−5.0
Built Environment->BMI->CRP	−.01 (−.03, .009)	−1.0	−.02 (−.05, −.01) ^**	−2.0
Income->Smoking->CRP	−.01 (−.01, −.001) ^**	−1.0	.003 (−.001, .008)	0.3
Education -> Smoking ->CRP	−.07 (−.11, −.02) ^***	−7.3	.02 (−.006, .05)	2.0

^**

indicates p < 0.01;

^***

indicates p < 0.001.

Notes: Only effects with p-values < 0.01 displayed. Income was scaled to units of $10,000 US; Percent change is the expected percent change in CRP levels for each one unit increase in the SES variable by way of the mediator; CRP is logged in analyses.