Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 9;36(2):157–175. doi: 10.1007/s10827-013-0463-7

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Effect of reducing the dendritic surface area and of reducing the soma’s surface area on a cell’s responses. ac An OFF S cell was simulated under normal conditions and then with the diameter of each dendritic compartment reduced by 10–50% in steps of 10%. a Phase plot showing that as the surface area is decreased (arrow), the action potentials increase in maximal amplitude and reach a higher rate of change. b The spike frequency shows a decrease in response to the change in morphology. c The burst frequency shows an increasing trend in response to the change in morphology. df An OFF S cell was simulated under normal conditions and then with the diameter and length of the soma reduced by 10–50 % in steps of 10 %. d Phase plot showing that as the surface area is decreased (arrow), the action potentials decrease in maximal amplitude and reach a lower maximal rate of change. This results in slower action potentials reaching lower amplitudes. e The spike frequency shows a steady increase in response to the change in morphology. f The burst frequency shows a decreasing trend in response to the change in morphology. In simulations NaP = 3.33 × 10−6 S/cm2, T = 5.36 × 10−4 S/cm2, and h = 10−9 S/cm2