Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 12;4:4354. doi: 10.1038/srep04354

Figure 3. Quantification of the algorithm performance.

Figure 3

The recall fraction Rf, localization error Lerr and intensity relative error Ierr were evaluated as a function of molecular density for different experimental settings. (a) For varying image resolution, i.e, FWHM, with SNR = 15 dB, I = 35 counts, Inline graphic = 50 counts2. (b) For varying SNR, with FWHM = 90 nm, I = 35 counts, Inline graphic = 50 counts2. (c) For varying mean intensity value I, with FWHM = 90 nm, SNR = 15 dB, Inline graphic = 50 counts2 and (d) for varying width of the intensity distribution Inline graphic, with FWHM = 90 nm, SNR = 15 dB and I = 35 counts.